Skip to content

Conversation

samueltardieu
Copy link
Member

@samueltardieu samueltardieu commented Sep 12, 2024

needless_pass_by_value sometimes suggest marking the concerned type as Copy. Adding a or before this suggestion makes it clearer that this is not the second part of the original suggestion, but an alternative one.

Inspired by a misunderstanding in #13321

changelog: none

`needless_pass_by_value` sometimes suggest marking the concerned type as
`Copy`. Adding a `or` before this suggestion makes it clearer that this
is not the second part of the original suggestion, but an alternative one.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 12, 2024

r? @xFrednet

rustbot has assigned @xFrednet.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Sep 12, 2024
@xFrednet
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, thank you for the improvement :D


Roses are red,
Or Blue.
They can implement copy,
But really don't have to.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 12, 2024

📌 Commit 6371b30 has been approved by xFrednet

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 12, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 6371b30 with merge 175341d...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2024
Make it clearer that the suggestion is an alternative one

`needless_pass_by_value` sometimes suggest marking the concerned type as `Copy`. Adding a `or` before this suggestion makes it clearer that this is not the second part of the original suggestion, but an alternative one.

Inspired by a misunderstanding in #13321
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 12, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-action_test

@samueltardieu
Copy link
Member Author

@xFrednet Forgot the changelog: none, now added.

@y21
Copy link
Member

y21 commented Sep 12, 2024

@bors retry

@xFrednet
Copy link
Contributor

Happens to the best of us :D

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 12, 2024

💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 12, 2024

📌 Commit 6371b30 has been approved by xFrednet

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 12, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 6371b30 with merge eb5d4b7...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 12, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: xFrednet
Pushing eb5d4b7 to master...

@bors bors merged commit eb5d4b7 into rust-lang:master Sep 12, 2024
8 checks passed
@samueltardieu samueltardieu deleted the push-qqtuttutxpmv branch November 3, 2024 16:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants